Please support VectorLinux!

Author Topic: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?  (Read 3605 times)

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« on: November 19, 2010, 04:09:26 pm »
I've been reading about the kernel patch that is supposed to improve performance of a Linux desktop:
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Galbraith-Linux-kernel-scheduling-patch/?kc=rss

Then there is this other one:
http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel-patch.html

I tried the alternative approach, but the system refuses to create the path specified. Anyone else tried this?

bligh

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2010, 11:03:50 pm »
There is discussion of it in the Puppy forums, in the programming section. 
Cheers

retired1af

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1283
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2010, 07:19:39 am »
I think I'll play with this today.. Looks like a fun project.  ;D
ASUS K73 Intel i3 Dual Core 2.3GHz

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2010, 05:20:28 am »
I was trying out the alternative, but it did not work because the kernel on SOHO 6 is not built with support for cgroups. I intend to build a kernel with that in for testing. I'll probably also take the opportunity to build a newer kernel and tweak the build config at the same time, but that will have to wait till I get some free time.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2010, 05:27:25 am by Joe1962 »
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2010, 06:19:19 am »
Finally got around to building that 2.6.36.1 kernel with cgroups. Tried the hack alternative and it seems to work, but I can't really say if things are faster or not, need some real testing for that. BTW, I had to use the ubuntu way to get it done, couldn't create that directory within /sys/fs for some reason.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 09:04:16 am by Joe1962 »
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10

M0E-lnx

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2010, 01:49:39 pm »
while we're on the subject, does our kernenels have kerneloops enabled?

Daniel

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
    • TuxToys - Packages for VectorLinux 6.0
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2010, 09:21:00 am »
Perhaps this performance boost (once it gets worked out) could be included in the VL7 release?
The following sentence is true. The previous sentence is false.

VL 6.0 SOHO KDE-Classic on 2.3 Ghz Dual-core AMD with 3 Gigs of RAM

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2011, 09:28:56 am »
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10

pierce.jason

  • Packager
  • Vectorite
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
Re: Anyone tried the new "miracle" performance hack?
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2011, 11:29:19 pm »
Are these anything like BFS scheduler or filesystem from CK Kolivas?
BFS coupled with a tweaked ext4 makes for a pretty snappy desktop system.

pierce.jason
pierce.jason
Email: $(echo -e "moc\x2eliamg\x40nosaj.ecreip" | rev)