VectorLinux

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Visit our home page for VL info. For support and documentation, visit the Vector Linux Knowledge Center or search the Knowledge Center and this Forum using the search box above.

Author Topic: One less word in English?  (Read 5927 times)

roarde

  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • move the needle
One less word in English?
« on: July 12, 2011, 07:15:00 pm »

Where I've been taught to use the word "fewer", I'm invariably seeing or hearing "less"; even from those known to be sticklers for the style manual.

So is "fewer" gone, leaving us with one less word?
Logged
Robert
VL 7.1 Light

GrannyGeek

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2567
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2011, 08:07:54 pm »

Where I've been taught to use the word "fewer", I'm invariably seeing or hearing "less"; even from those known to be sticklers for the style manual.

So is "fewer" gone, leaving us with one less word?

Using "less" when "fewer" is the right word drives my husband crazy. With me, it's one of a large number of common grammatical errors. It doesn't bother me as much as using "it's" as a possessive pronoun. The possessive pronoun is "its"; "it's" is a contraction for "it is" or "it has." I also can't stand the so-called greengrocer's plural--using 's to form a plural. NO, NO, NO! "Lemon's" is not the plural of "lemon."

I have given up hope.
--GrannyGeek
Logged
Registered Linux User #397786

Happily running VL 7 Gold on  a Sempron LE-1300 desktop (2.3 GHz), 4 G RAM,  GeForce 6150 SE onboard graphics and on an HP Pavilion dv7 i7, 6 gigs, Intel 2nd Generation Integrated Graphics Controller

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4140
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2011, 11:49:35 pm »

It's a losing battle. If you can't beat'em, join'em.
Logged

roarde

  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • move the needle
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2011, 08:22:05 am »

My question was somewhat of a complaint, but moreso a question. Languages change all the time. I don't expect it, but am kinda hoping someone lately or currently in school might verify that, yeah, it's being taught the other way now. Of course, that'd be hard to do if one learned the new way and didn't know what I meant, so here're the very basics of the way I learned:

Fewer buckets, less water. Less grass, fewer blades of it.
Buckets and blades can be counted, water and grass cannot.
--and--
"15 items or fewer this lane", regardless of what signage the grocer has posted.
                                    (^ incorrect punctuation by rule, but clearer. I'll stop while I still can. ;-))
So, have the rules changed?

BTW: Sedans, coupes, SUV's, convertibles, and ATV's are all correct plurals as are Chevrolets and Chevy's. And that's been the rule for as long as I know. The apostrophe when making acronyms or contractions plural irks me, but it has been the rule and pluralizing them without the ' causes its own problems.
Logged
Robert
VL 7.1 Light

hurricane

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2011, 12:19:47 am »

I've always been a stickler for correct English, but I don't ever remember learning the difference between fewer than less, except that I know that you can't say fewer water, but I would use less and fewer interchangeably for buckets.
The things I have trouble with is the expression the data "is"; the verb should be "are" because data are plural. Datum is the singular version of that word.
My husband used to always say went when he meant gone. That irked me.
I also find it weird to say mothers-in-law rather than mother-in-laws.
I remember being taught in school the difference between set and sit, and I didn't know anyone in my generation who mixed those two up, but my mother-in-law will say set instead of sit.
Another word that has become part of our language: irregardless - why not just say regardless?
I have also heard people say conversate when they mean converse.
Logged

RJARRRPCGP

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2011, 12:43:20 pm »


 It doesn't bother me as much as using "it's" as a possessive pronoun. The possessive pronoun is "its"; "it's" is a contraction for "it is" or "it has."

QFT!
Logged

Murdock

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
    • Arenal Botanical Garden
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2011, 03:01:22 am »

I prefer to see fewer irrelevant posts. ;D
Logged

The Headacher

  • Louder than you
  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 1553
  • I like the bass to go BOOM!
    • Multimedia on VL (work in progress)
Re: One less word in English?
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2011, 09:31:49 am »

Wow, learned something new in The Lounge! I probably did that wrong until now. I'll try not to make this mistake again.
Logged
Most music on my soundcloud page was arranged in programs running on VL.