Please support VectorLinux!

Author Topic: mdadm for VL64  (Read 2597 times)

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
mdadm for VL64
« on: February 16, 2013, 02:23:04 pm »
The package udisks-1.0.4-x86_64-1vl70 lists dep which I don't see in our repo:
mdadm >= 2.6.4

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2013, 07:01:30 pm »
I have test rebuild udisk-1.0.4 in the buildbot and it seem it did not need mdadm as dependency...you can try udisk-1.0.4 v2 in the untested repo...
But i also build mdadm in the untested repo...just in case :)

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2013, 04:04:07 am »
32-bit: both udisks and mdadm installed without errors.

64-bit: Found another dep issue for udisks-1.0.4-x86_64-2vl70.txz:
Code: [Select]
udisks: Depends: sg3_utils >= 1.32-x86_64-1vl70The version in repo is "sg3_utils-1.31-x86_64-1vl70". I forced install using this version and no problems noted.

mdadm installed without any problems, and responded normally when run. :)

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2013, 04:06:32 pm »
I have build sg3_utils-1.33 in the untested repo...pls try it

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2013, 06:01:06 pm »
Packages installed without complaints. System functions properly. Looks good!  :)

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2013, 06:12:42 pm »
about udisk...u want to use the current version with mdadm as dep or the new build (without mdadm as dep) in the untested repo?

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2013, 02:15:53 am »
In this case it is a very minor issue, but generally I prefer deps to be real requirements. I vote for the package with the least amount of baggage.  ;)

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2013, 05:51:50 am »
maybe i just ask them to move the new udisk build to testing repo...

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2013, 03:17:34 am »
Hm.. I guess the untested repo gets cleaned out on a schedule? The package is no longer available from any location. Same with the new udisks and sg3_utils.  :(

retired1af

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2013, 04:08:52 am »
I do believe it does. If I recall, I think we decided on a 14 day window. (If you paid attention to the Google Group, you'd have known that.  ;D  )
ASUS K73 Intel i3 Dual Core 2.3GHz

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2013, 08:11:26 am »
If you paid attention
Thank you for reminding me of my ex-wife...  :D

Cleaning out the clutter is a good idea. However, it would been nice if the packages hata_ph built, which were verified good, could have been moved to testing. What a tease.. gah, there is that memory again!

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2013, 11:50:18 pm »
If you paid attention
Thank you for reminding me of my ex-wife...  :D

Cleaning out the clutter is a good idea. However, it would been nice if the packages hata_ph built, which were verified good, could have been moved to testing. What a tease.. gah, there is that memory again!

You can rebuild the packages via the buildbot in the untested repo...

nightflier

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 4072
Re: mdadm for VL64
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2013, 03:47:35 am »
Thank you hata_ph. I figured out the basics and got mdadm built. Now udisks wants ntfsprogs, which failed to build. I'm wondering about some of these deps..  >:(