Please support VectorLinux!

Author Topic: Difference between Standard and GOLD?  (Read 2153 times)

JohnKFT

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« on: July 24, 2007, 04:22:15 am »
I currently have 5.8 Standard running on my laptop, installed from an old CD that I burned when 5.8 first came out.  5.8 GOLD sounds more whizzy but I cannot find anywhere on the website how different it is from my original 5.8 Standard.  Is it worth moving up to it before I get too settled into this Standard one?  Can anyone tell me the difference?

hata_ph

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 3261
  • -- Just being myself --
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2007, 04:59:16 am »
I believe standard and GOLD version is the same..........maybe the different is some bugfix and security update.............. ;D

retired1af

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2007, 05:00:46 am »
It's possible you have one of the Release Candidates... Type: cat /etc/vector-version to find the actual version you're using.
ASUS K73 Intel i3 Dual Core 2.3GHz

JohnKFT

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2007, 11:37:11 pm »
Vector Linux 5.8 Standard 12-16-2006.  I just put 5.8 SOHO on my desktop, and that seems to be whizzier.  I installed Xfce 4.4 and it makes my dual-boot XP feel like wading through treacle!  I think I will extend my partition a bit on the laptop and put that on it running Xfce too.  I couldn't upgrade Xfce to 4.4 on the laptop because of glibc, so this will enable me to forge ahead, although I do not want KDE.  Thanks for the clues.

Artthou

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2007, 08:13:32 am »
SOHO seemed faster than Standard?  Is your laptop fairly endowed as far as memory and processor speed go?

wcs

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1144
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2007, 11:51:41 am »
Incidentally, I also found that SOHO seemed snappier than Standard after a fresh install...
Of course, this is completely subjective and probably contaminated by the placebo effect.

After a while, though, KDE started showing its weight.
Now I'm back at standard, but I wondered if xfce in SOHO wouldn't be faster than in Standard.

If that is true, or why that should be the case, I have no idea. Any performance improvements in SOHO?

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2007, 01:30:07 pm »
If that is true, or why that should be the case, I have no idea. Any performance improvements in SOHO?
For one, SOHO has my kernel config... :P ;D
« Last Edit: July 27, 2007, 01:32:18 pm by Joe1962 »
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10

retired1af

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2007, 01:48:20 pm »
And what a nice config it is....  ;D
ASUS K73 Intel i3 Dual Core 2.3GHz

wcs

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1144
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2007, 05:34:29 am »
Quote
For one, SOHO has my kernel config...

That explains it!
Hope to get more of that kernel magic in future versions of VL.  ;)

Thank you.

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: Difference between Standard and GOLD?
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2007, 05:42:15 am »
IIRC, the 2.6.19.2 upgrade kernel for Standard was based on that config, too.
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10