Please support VectorLinux!

Author Topic: theoretical probability question for mathematicians  (Read 2334 times)

Triarius Fidelis

  • Vecteloper
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2399
  • Domine, exaudi vocem meam
    • my website
theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« on: September 27, 2007, 10:31:24 pm »
I read that the probability that at least one of events A and B will occur in a trial is P(A + B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(AB), where A and B are not mutually exclusive events. That makes sense, because one would count the probabilities of A and B together, and then ignore event AB, because that counts instances of A and B twice, in the same way that the probability that at least one die of two will turn up six is 11/36, not 1/3.

That made sense intuitively, but I couldn't quite follow the proof because it mentioned things I never saw before. I noticed however, that the following relation also appears to be true (AC and BC are complementary events because latex2html is a dick.)

P(ACBC) + P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ABC) = 1
P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ABC) = 1 - P(ACBC)

and so

P(A + B) = 1 - P(ACBC)

I did it on some practice examples and it made sense, but what do I know...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2007, 05:01:33 am by hanumizzle »
"Leatherface, you BITCH! Ho Chi Minh, hah hah hah!"

Formerly known as "Epic Fail Guy" and "Döden" in recent months

carsten

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • I know why birds sing ...
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2007, 02:57:38 am »
The solution is 42

Carsten

... and thanx for the fish
Tam exacte ut oportet, non ut licet!

exeterdad

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2046
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2007, 04:09:32 am »

P(ACBC) + P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ACB) = 1
P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ACB) = 1 - P(ACBC)

and so

P(A + B) = 1 - P(ACBC)

Whaddid he say??  ???  One of these days that brain of yours is going to blow up Hanu.

rbistolfi

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2299
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2007, 07:23:05 am »
God, I missed you  :D
"There is a concept which corrupts and upsets all others. I refer not to Evil, whose limited realm is that of ethics; I refer to the infinite."
Jorge Luis Borges, Avatars of the Tortoise.

--
Jumalauta!!

M0E-lnx

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2007, 07:27:06 am »
WoW.....
My brains just overheated from just reading and trying to make sense of this thread....

I better leave it alone

saulgoode

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 340
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2007, 08:39:21 am »
Shouldn't the starting point for the complementary case be stated:

P(ACBC) + P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ABC) = 1

« Last Edit: September 28, 2007, 08:46:40 am by saulgoode »
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.

Vanger

  • Packager
  • Vectorite
  • ****
  • Posts: 118
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2007, 08:49:26 am »
Use the common graphical representation via circles and everything should be clear.
Running silent, running deep

MikeCindi

  • Tester
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1073
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2007, 10:01:44 am »
Shouldn't the starting point for the complementary case be stated:

P(ACBC) + P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ABC) = 1
That's correct...and I believe that the way Hanu worked his query is using this starting point versus his. Thus just a typo on his part. I'm not sure that I'm the one to comment on whether he got it right though...
« Last Edit: September 28, 2007, 10:04:34 am by mikecindi »
The plans of the diligent lead to profit...Pro. 21:5
VL64 7.1b3                                     RLU 486143

Triarius Fidelis

  • Vecteloper
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2399
  • Domine, exaudi vocem meam
    • my website
Re: theoretical probability question for mathematicians
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2007, 05:02:14 am »
Shouldn't the starting point for the complementary case be stated:

P(ACBC) + P(AB) + P(ACB) + P(ABC) = 1



Yes...  :-[
"Leatherface, you BITCH! Ho Chi Minh, hah hah hah!"

Formerly known as "Epic Fail Guy" and "Döden" in recent months