VectorLinux

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Visit our home page for VL info. For support and documentation, visit the Vector Linux Knowledge Center or search the Knowledge Center and this Forum using the search box above.

Author Topic: Lightweight Browsers  (Read 2615 times)

lagagnon

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 1922
Lightweight Browsers
« on: October 04, 2007, 10:31:31 pm »

There is a good review of the lighterweight browsers now available at this blog :

http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/02/lightweight-browser-rundown/
Logged
"As people become more intelligent they care less for preachers and more for teachers". Robert G. Ingersoll

easuter

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2160
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2007, 11:41:47 pm »

H3V kicks ass!  ;D
It renders a lot better than Dillo (fonts...everything), it has proper UTF-8  support and its fast.

Great find lagagnon, that opened my eyes to other great text-mode browsers too...
Logged

lagagnon

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2007, 08:07:45 am »

Great find lagagnon, ...
Not me really. Thanks to this wonderful Linux and other things computing news site that compiles the best stories from a number of the better news sites:

http://freshnews.org/

My favourite site in their collection is RootPrompt.
Logged
"As people become more intelligent they care less for preachers and more for teachers". Robert G. Ingersoll

M0E-lnx

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 3217
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2007, 08:31:06 am »

The only disadvantage I see to using H3V is where they say it takes long to load while it's rendering it's buttons and components.

That would suck.

but it does look good.

tomh38

  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2007, 09:23:52 am »

Thanks for posting this lagagnon.  I'm going to keep a text file of these since I often need a light browser when X is down or I'm working with a (very) old machine.  I've been using links but IMHO more choices = better.

Tom
Logged
"I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones." - Linus Torvalds, April 1991

lagagnon

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2007, 10:16:56 am »

The only disadvantage I see to using H3V is where they say it takes long to load while it's rendering it's buttons and components.
And I don' t think there is any way around that (despite the author's hopes for the future) as it is using the Tk toolkit, which is a scripted language - very easy to program GUI stuff in - but rather slow to show.
Logged
"As people become more intelligent they care less for preachers and more for teachers". Robert G. Ingersoll

easuter

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2160
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2007, 12:33:05 pm »

The only disadvantage I see to using H3V is where they say it takes long to load while it's rendering it's buttons and components.
And I don' t think there is any way around that (despite the author's hopes for the future) as it is using the Tk toolkit, which is a scripted language - very easy to program GUI stuff in - but rather slow to show.

True, but we have aMSN included in VL Standard, which is also a TCL/TK app.
Logged

blurymind

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1082
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2007, 02:27:08 am »

a terminal broswer,which renders images without even the need of X... interesting

this article is very interesting,thank you for pointing it
Logged
status: playing around with new tablet and learning to 3d :p
google page :  http://blurymind.googlepages.com
DA PAGE :  http://www.blurymind.deviantart.com/

newt

  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2007, 12:21:19 pm »

a terminal broswer,which renders images without even the need of X... interesting
Unfortunately, I don't think that's the case.  Looks like "graphics mode" (i.e. the mode that displays images) requires some kind of x windowing server.
Quote
-Links runs in graphics mode (mouse required) on X Window System (UN*X, Cygwin), SVGAlib, Linux Framebuffer, OS/2 PMShell, AtheOS GUI
-Links runs in text mode (mouse optional) on UN*X console, ssh/telnet virtual terminal, vt100 terminal, xterm, and virtually any other text terminal. Mouse is supported for GPM, xterm, and OS/2. Links supports colors on terminal.
-Tables, frames in both graphics and text mode, builtin image display in graphics mode
-Builtin image display for GIF, JPEG, PNG, XBM, TIFF in graphics mode
Logged

kidd

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2007, 01:07:18 pm »

I think w3m can. It uses some kind of framebuffer feature IIRC.  Not tried it though :(
http://images.google.es/images?q=w3m&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi
shows it seems to render images in a console.  Don't know for tty.

exeterdad

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2046
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2007, 01:44:47 pm »

That is cool!  Me thinks I might have to check that out!
Logged

uelsk8s

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
Re: Lightweight Browsers
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2007, 02:09:33 pm »

links2 can run in the linux framebuffer, the one that displays text and bootsplash on bootup/shutdown
Logged