VectorLinux
April 25, 2014, 12:25:16 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Visit our home page for VL info. To search the old message board go to http://vectorlinux.com/forum1. The first VL forum is temporarily offline until we can find a host for it. Thanks for your patience.
 
Now powered by KnowledgeDex.
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Please support VectorLinux!
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: 5.9 Is A Little Bit Sluggish  (Read 7692 times)
BlueMage
Vectorite
***
Posts: 274



« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2008, 01:09:09 am »

I've actually found 5.9 to be noticibly sluggish, even compared to KDE in 5.8 SOHO.  I found this odd, until I figured out the culprit - seems HAL is quite the resource-hog after all.

Either that, or a month of Puppy and flux has made me very, very spoilt Tongue
Logged

Acer Laptop:  Vector 5.8 SOHO Final & Windows XP Professional & USB (still alive!)
Compaq POS (almost dead): Vector 5.9 Light Beta 5
Quad-core BEAST: Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit & Vector 5.9 64-bit beta-2
Old 500MHz media box:  Vector 5.8 SOHO Final (dead)
701 EeePC:  Puppeee (based on Puppy 4.01)
Joe1962
Administrator
Vectorian
*****
Posts: 2498



WWW
« Reply #31 on: January 28, 2008, 06:34:31 pm »

Oops, changing video drivers broke mplayer, i get Error opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device

If someone knows the answer off the top of their head great.  I will try the mplayer list but I'm sure that if I just use gslapt to remove and reinstall it it will be fine

When I install the propietary ATI drivers on my notebook, I have to set the video out device in mplayer to opengl.
Logged

O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10
markus
Member
*
Posts: 9


« Reply #32 on: January 28, 2008, 07:15:49 pm »

Joe1962 Thank you, that worked.

I brought home an older 32M Nvidia card, installed the proprietary Nvidia drivers and got about the same gain over the vesa driver as the vesa driver got over the intel driver.

I guess the conclusion to this is that the new xorg gains more from a better vid card (or maybe suffers more from a weak vid card).  Since most of the salvage machines I have access to are retired corporate machines they have weak onboard video.
Logged
BlueMage
Vectorite
***
Posts: 274



« Reply #33 on: January 28, 2008, 09:37:10 pm »

I feel your pain on that brother - ex-corporate are a great, cheap source of machines, but the onboard video usually bites.  I've got one slim box around here that has no CD drive, and would refuse to run anything but vesa, despite the fact that it was only 2 or 3 years old.

They're fun boxes to try different things out on, for sure, but damn can they be a pain at times too.
Logged

Acer Laptop:  Vector 5.8 SOHO Final & Windows XP Professional & USB (still alive!)
Compaq POS (almost dead): Vector 5.9 Light Beta 5
Quad-core BEAST: Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit & Vector 5.9 64-bit beta-2
Old 500MHz media box:  Vector 5.8 SOHO Final (dead)
701 EeePC:  Puppeee (based on Puppy 4.01)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!