April 18, 2015, 06:38:34 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Visit our home page for VL info. To search the old message board go to The first VL forum is temporarily offline until we can find a host for it. Thanks for your patience.
Now powered by KnowledgeDex.
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Please support VectorLinux!
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Broadcom wireless legality?  (Read 1973 times)
Posts: 1132

« on: January 15, 2008, 10:02:29 pm »

I just saw this post in the user comments on the latest distrowatch weekly (I know, I know) and it has me wondering if this is true:
30 • @7 (by Adam Williamson on 2008-01-14 16:49:25 GMT from Canada)
There is, in fact, no reliable way to legally include a driver for a Broadcom wireless chip that will work without external downloads.

The native driver - bcm43xx, or b43 - requires firmware to work correctly. This firmware can *only* be acquired by extracting it from a Windows driver for the card. Every available copy of the Windows driver for Broadcom cards is licensed in such a way that it cannot legally be packaged into a Linux distribution.

Using ndiswrapper, the alternative method, of course also requires the Windows driver.

The only way either method can work without an external download is if you already have a Windows driver for the chip on your system, but this cannot be relied upon.

Any distro which allows a Broadcom chip to work out of the box without an external download (or without discovering a copy of the Windows driver already present on your machine) is breaking the law by including either a full Windows driver, or the firmware extracted from it, in clear breach of the license.

I've always had bcm43xx working out of the box for me since (at least) vl58.
Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!