Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


Visit our home page for VL info. For support and documentation, visit the Vector Linux Knowledge Center or search the Knowledge Center and this Forum using the search box above.

Author Topic: Broadcom wireless legality?  (Read 3132 times)


  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Broadcom wireless legality?
« on: January 15, 2008, 10:02:29 pm »

I just saw this post in the user comments on the latest distrowatch weekly (I know, I know) and it has me wondering if this is true:
30 • @7 (by Adam Williamson on 2008-01-14 16:49:25 GMT from Canada)
There is, in fact, no reliable way to legally include a driver for a Broadcom wireless chip that will work without external downloads.

The native driver - bcm43xx, or b43 - requires firmware to work correctly. This firmware can *only* be acquired by extracting it from a Windows driver for the card. Every available copy of the Windows driver for Broadcom cards is licensed in such a way that it cannot legally be packaged into a Linux distribution.

Using ndiswrapper, the alternative method, of course also requires the Windows driver.

The only way either method can work without an external download is if you already have a Windows driver for the chip on your system, but this cannot be relied upon.

Any distro which allows a Broadcom chip to work out of the box without an external download (or without discovering a copy of the Windows driver already present on your machine) is breaking the law by including either a full Windows driver, or the firmware extracted from it, in clear breach of the license.

I've always had bcm43xx working out of the box for me since (at least) vl58.