VectorLinux

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Visit our home page for VL info. For support and documentation, visit the Vector Linux Knowledge Center or search the Knowledge Center and this Forum using the search box above.

Poll

Which File System do you usually install with VL ?

ext3
- 10 (37%)
JFS
- 2 (7.4%)
ReiserFS
- 10 (37%)
XFS
- 5 (18.5%)
other
- 0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 27


Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: File System Poll  (Read 4270 times)

flip city

  • Packager
  • Vectorite
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
  • Way Out In HyperSpace
File System Poll
« on: June 15, 2009, 08:13:48 pm »

You may also wish to explain why or whatever suits your fancy.

Witek Mozga

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • Witek Mozga`s Webpages
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2009, 02:14:41 am »

You may also wish to explain why or whatever suits your fancy.

I polled it a year ago:
http://forum.vectorlinux.com/index.php?topic=6586.0

MikeCindi

  • Tester
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1075
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2009, 10:15:25 am »

My post a year ago I was using reiserfs now I use XFS.
Logged
The plans of the diligent lead to profit...Pro. 21:5
 VL64 7.1                                     RLU 486143

M0E-lnx

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 3280
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2009, 10:34:02 am »

I did a reverse of what mikecindi did...
I was on xfs a year ago, I'm in reiserfs now.
Mostly because of the lack of tools for xfs.. no way to resize

newt

  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2009, 10:52:25 am »

I did a reverse of what mikecindi did...
I was on xfs a year ago, I'm in reiserfs now.
Mostly because of the lack of tools for xfs.. no way to resize
Same here. Not that I've ever needed to resize my partitions, but _IF_ I did I would want the option.
Logged

MikeCindi

  • Tester
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1075
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2009, 06:51:38 pm »

Initially resizing was a significant reason I chose reiserfs but also because in some early comparisons (on 2.4 kernels) it out performed xfs, jfs, and ext3 in most areas. The same person who did those early comparisons then later did similar ones on a 2.6 kernel and xfs was slightly better then jfs and easily better the reiserfs in its performance. I also noted over the past year or so that I never needed to resize my partitions so reiserfs became less favorable to me. Now if I suspect that I will need to resize a partition then reiserfs is my choice (and actually you can enlarge xfs just not shrink it at least not easily/practically). As for ext2/3 they have proven stability but way too much overhead. (Actually ext2 performs well but not being journaled has a significant downside.)
FWIW,
Mike
« Last Edit: June 16, 2009, 06:53:13 pm by MikeCindi »
Logged
The plans of the diligent lead to profit...Pro. 21:5
 VL64 7.1                                     RLU 486143

Joe1962

  • Administrator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 2499
    • Joe1962's Website
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2009, 06:29:59 am »

I was always reiserfs user (though I flirted with ext3 for a short while), then moved to xfs when 6.0 came out, but for some reason it seemed quite slower, so am now back to reiserfs.
Logged
O'Neill (RE the Asgard): "Usually they ask nicely before they ignore us and do what they damn well please."
http://joe1962.bigbox.info
Running: VL 7 Std 64 + self-cooked XFCE-4.10

Witek Mozga

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • Witek Mozga`s Webpages
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2009, 06:58:04 am »

I have used reiserfs, XFS and JFS (parallely on several machines). I did not notice any substantial differences between their efficiency in everyday desktop use.

StrayBit

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2009, 07:06:14 am »

Generally I use reiserfs.  I've tried ext3 and xfs each once.  I've forgotten why the attempts lasted such a short time.
Logged
Dell GX280: 7.1-Gold 32 bit
HP 670 Win7 & VL7.0
Gateway LT200 Win XP dead!

lagagnon

  • Global Moderator
  • Vectorian
  • *****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2009, 12:25:03 pm »

I have installed VL on numerous computers (probably over 400 by now) for a charity - always using ReiserFS. Never had a filesystem problem any any one of them over a period of 4 years or so....
Logged
"As people become more intelligent they care less for preachers and more for teachers". Robert G. Ingersoll

Windozer

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
  • Have Vector Linux, Will Travel.
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2009, 01:06:44 pm »

Flip,

I'm in the reiser crowd.

started with ext3, went to reiser, then noodled with XFS - and as Joe said, I too found it slower in some tests.  On the recommendations of some of our dear forum members, I went back to reiser. And I've not had a problem since - knock on wood - or rather knock on spinning, metallic-sputtered aluminum substrates :))

Although this is a tad off your poll, I wonder what ext4 is really like - anyone used it ?

- Howard
Logged
483,617th Registered Linux Snoozer

sparkyhall

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2009, 02:04:46 pm »

Ext3 for me for no reason other than I wanted a reliable file system and the comparison tests I saw showed very little difference between any of them.

Chris
Logged

GrannyGeek

  • Packager
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 2567
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2009, 07:01:28 pm »

I always used reiserfs, but my last two installs I switched to ext3. I had to install a fresh VL6 Deluxe when Flash stopped working in Opera on my original VL6 Deluxe partition. I tried *everything* to fix this, but finally threw in the towel and installed another VL6 Deluxe on a different partition using ext3. Flash is working with Opera on this partition.

I have no evidence that reiserfs had anything to do with this problem, but I figured what the heck? I tried everything else. Maybe it was a file system glitch. When my Turion laptop died and I set up my old Toshiba laptop with VL6 Light, I used ext3 on it. I haven't noticed any performance differences.
--GrannyGeek
Logged
Registered Linux User #397786

Happily running VL 7 Gold on  a Sempron LE-1300 desktop (2.3 GHz), 4 G RAM,  GeForce 6150 SE onboard graphics and on an HP Pavilion dv7 i7, 6 gigs, Intel 2nd Generation Integrated Graphics Controller

Witek Mozga

  • Vectorite
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • Witek Mozga`s Webpages
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2009, 05:28:36 am »

Although this is a tad off your poll, I wonder what ext4 is really like - anyone used it ?

I am using it for data partition. It seems to work OK. I also installed slackware current-ISO using ext4. Everything is fine.

MikeCindi

  • Tester
  • Vectorian
  • ****
  • Posts: 1075
Re: File System Poll
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2009, 07:05:51 am »

The very little experience I have with ext4 reminded me why I don't use the journaled ext# filesystems. Their overhead is unaccepatable.
As for performance of any FS for the average user there will probably not be significant differences noticed. Surfing the web, typing letters/email, looking at graphics, etc. are not disk-intensive tasks. It's when one is moving a lot of data from one place to another that your FS performance or lack thereof shows up.
Logged
The plans of the diligent lead to profit...Pro. 21:5
 VL64 7.1                                     RLU 486143
Pages: [1] 2